Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar

Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is an excellent alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s podsmall.com great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For that reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into the mouth area, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to utilize to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke a different one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.

Along with the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes that you can buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.